Interest of Z.M.M.

Full title: In the INTEREST OF: Z.M.M. Juvenile Officer, D.E.W. and L.S.W.…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Nov 19, 2019

590 S.W.3d 878 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 82220

11-19-2019

In the INTEREST OF: Z.M.M. Juvenile Officer, D.E.W. and L.S.W., Respondents, v. A.S.M., Appellant.

Lori Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent Juvenile Officer. Nancy Gray, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem for Z.M.M. Ryan F. Kaiser and Sarah H. Ginther, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondents D.E.W. and L.S.W. Michelle N. Higinbotham, Lee’s Summit, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Lori Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent Juvenile Officer.

Nancy Gray, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem for Z.M.M.

Ryan F. Kaiser and Sarah H. Ginther, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondents D.E.W. and L.S.W.

Michelle N. Higinbotham, Lee’s Summit, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division One: Edward R. Ardini, Presiding Judge, and Mark D. Pfeiffer and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

A.S.M. appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Family Court Division, terminating her parental rights to her daughter, Z.M.M. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided the parties a memorandum of law explaining today’s ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).