Opinion
2:22-cv-00827-JAD-VCF
01-18-2023
Interbill, Inc., Petitioner v. Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems NV Corp., Respondent
ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT
[ECF NO. 35]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
On December 21, 2022, I granted petitioner Interbill, Inc.'s motion to confirm its arbitration award against respondent Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems NV Corp., formerly known as Atlantic-Pacific Proceedings Systems, LLC. Judgment was entered “against Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems, LLC.” Interbill now moves to amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) to reflect both “Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems NV Corp” and “Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems LLC,” noting that the respondent “has referred to itself as the legal entity formerly known as Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems, LLC.” The deadline for Atlantic-Pacific Processing to oppose this motion has passed, and no response was filed. Respondent's failure to respond to the motion constitutes a consent to granting it under Local Rule 7-2(d), and I find good cause to correct this clerical mistake in the judgment.
ECF No. 33.
ECF No. 34.
ECF No. 35.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Interbill's motion to amend the judgment [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to AMEND the Judgment at ECF No. 34 to read as follows: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Interbill, Inc. and against Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems NV Corp., formerly known as Atlantic-Pacific Processing Systems, LLC, for $813,355.95 in damages, $55,824.85 in prejudgment interest, and $74,537.11 in attorneys' fees and costs, for a total judgment of $943,717.91.