Opinion
Case No.: 3:12-cv-06575-JSW (LB)
05-08-2013
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. VIRAL TOLAT, an individual, and DOES 1-20, Defendant.
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP Jack Russo Attorneys for Plaintiff INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP. KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP Steven G. Eckhaus, pro hac vice Stuart M. Richter Attorneys for Defendant VIRAL TOLAT
JACK RUSSO (State Bar No. 96068)
CHRISTOPHER SARGENT (State Bar No. 246285)
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
401 Florence Street
Palo Alto, CA 94301
Telephone: (650) 327-9800
Facsimile: (650) 618-1863
E-mail: jrusso@computerlaw.com
csargent@computerlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
JOINT STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on January 4, 2013, the Court issued an Order Setting Case Management Conference and Requiring Joint Case Management Conference Statement (Dkt. 17), setting the Case Management Conference for April 19, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 11;
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2013, the parties files a Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing the Case Management Conference (Dkt. 53); on April 2, 2013, granted the Joint Stipulation and order Continuing the Case Management Conference (Dkt. 54) continuing the Case Management Conference to June 14, 2013;
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Administrative Motion for Early Telephonic Case Management Conference (Dkt. 63); on May 2, 2013, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiff's Administrative Motion for Early Telephonic Case Management Conference (Dkt. 71) setting the Case Management Conference to May 10, 2013;
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation requesting Mediation (Dkt. 69); on April 30, 2013, the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Corley (Dkt. 70 and text entry);
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2013, the parties conducted a call with Magistrate Judge Corley setting a settlement conference/mediation date of May 22, 2013;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed that, to ensure that the Case Management Conference is as efficacious as possible, the parties request that the Court continue the May 10, 2013, Case Management Conference so that it occurs after the parties' mediation; specifically, the parties request a new Case Management Conference date of May 24, 2013 following the scheduled mediation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP
By: ___________
Jack Russo
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INTEGRAL DEVELOPMENT CORP.
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
By: ___________
Steven G. Eckhaus, pro hac vice
Stuart M. Richter
Attorneys for Defendant
VIRAL TOLAT
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
As required by General Order 45, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
___________
Jack Russo, Esq.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the parties' joint request is GRANTED and the May 10, 2013, Case Management Conference is continued and shall be held on May 24, 2013.at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge