From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Integon Preferred Ins. Co. v. Isztojka

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2011
No. 2:07-cv-00526-TMB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-00526-TMB.

February 17, 2011


ORDER [Re: Advisory Jury]


The gravaman of this action sounds in equity, i.e., rescission of an insurance policy. The matter is scheduled for trial before an advisory jury. After review of the pretrial statements filed by the parties, it is unclear to the court precisely which disputed material issues of fact either party has requested be submitted to the jury.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT, not later than the close of business, Thursday, February 17, 2011, each party advise the court specifically:

1. Whether a jury trial is requested on any material disputed issue of fact; and

2. If a jury trial is requested on a material issue of fact, identify with particularity the question to be submitted to the jury.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a failure to comply with this Order will be deemed by the court as consent by that party to a bench trial without an advisory jury.

Dated: February 16, 2011


Summaries of

Integon Preferred Ins. Co. v. Isztojka

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 17, 2011
No. 2:07-cv-00526-TMB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Integon Preferred Ins. Co. v. Isztojka

Case Details

Full title:INTEGON PREFERRED INSURANCE CO. Plaintiff, v. SUSANA ISZTOJKA, d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2011

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-00526-TMB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011)