From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Insurance Company of North America v. Puckett

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 4, 1976
229 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52564.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 13, 1976.

DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1976.

Workmen's compensation. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Henley.

Smith, Cohen, Ringel, Kohler Martin, Robert L. Kiser, for appellants.

W. Scott Walters, Jr., for appellee.


The appellant insurer appeals from an order of the Superior Court of DeKalb County affirming a workmen's compensation award to the appellee by the full board.


ARGUED SEPTEMBER 13, 1976 — DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1976.


1. There is sufficient evidence to show a "change of condition" under Code § 114-709, as amended. Miller v. Argonaut Ins. Co., 136 Ga. App. 101 ( 220 S.E.2d 89). The appellant further contends that the change of condition was the result of intervening causes. The record demonstrates that the claimant's doctor when asked if there had been any new back injuries replied: "The answer is no. I do not find any indications of a new injury or cause from an injury." This is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the change of condition was ultimately related to the claimant's employment-related injury and not to an intervening cause. International Ins. Co. v. Whitfield, 135 Ga. App. 216 ( 217 S.E.2d 192).

2. The appellant urges that the board had no power to consider the claimant's application because a prior award approving a settlement had been issued. Ga. L. 1975, pp. 190, 192 (Code Ann. § 114-106). The settlement was made in 1973 however, under former Code Ann. § 114-106, without the claimant being represented by counsel. The agreement was therefore invalid and unenforceable. Williams v. Bituminous Cas. Co., 121 Ga. App. 175 ( 173 S.E.2d 250); Bowen v. Sentry Ins. Co., 134 Ga. App. 88 ( 213 S.E.2d 185).

3. By separate motion, the appellee moves this court for damages under Code § 6-1801 on the grounds of an appeal for delay only and for attorney fees under Code § 114-712. As to the former, we believe there is enough question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to militate against the sanction of Code § 6-1801. As to the latter, awarding attorney fees in this case would require an overruling of Dunn v. Am. Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 64 Ga. App. 509 ( 13 S.E.2d 902); Baggett Transp. Co. v. Barnes, 113 Ga. App. 58 ( 147 S.E.2d 372); and, Zurich Ins. Co. v. McDuffie, 117 Ga. App. 90 ( 159 S.E.2d 423). This we decline to do. Motion for damages and attorney fees is denied.

Judgment affirmed. Quillian and Webb, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Insurance Company of North America v. Puckett

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 4, 1976
229 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Insurance Company of North America v. Puckett

Case Details

Full title:INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA et al. v. PUCKETT

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 4, 1976

Citations

229 S.E.2d 550 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
229 S.E.2d 550

Citing Cases

Gardner v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

The appellant contends such finding was erroneous in that the statute had not run because the standard…