From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Insurance Co. v. Mobley

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 7, 1911
89 S.C. 189 (S.C. 1911)

Opinion

7951

July 7, 1911.

Before DeVORE, J., Lancaster, April, 1910. Reversed.

Action by New York Life Insurance Company against Nannie B. Mobley. Defendant appeals from the following order:

"On hearing the verified complaint, filed in the above entitled cause, and on motion of James H. McIntosh and R.B. Allison, attorneys for the plaintiff herein:

"It is adjudged, ordered and decreed that the defendant, Nannie B. Mobley, her agents and attorneys, be enjoined and restrained from selling, assigning or transferring the judgment obtained and entered up by her against the New York Life Insurance Company, in the case of Nannie B. Mobley, as plaintiff, against the New York Life Insurance Company, as defendant, and that the said Nannie B. Mobley, her agents and attorneys, be also enjoined and restrained from causing execution to be issued thereon or levy to be made on account thereof, on any of the property of the said New York Life Insurance Company; and that this injunction or restraining order stand in full force until the final hearing of this cause.

"Let a copy of this order be served on the defendant, Nannie B. Mobley, her attorney, and the sheriff."

Mr. J. Harry Foster, for appellant, cites: Injunction should not be granted without bond: 29 S.C. 491; 5 S.C. 177; 51 S.C. 388.

Messrs. James H. McIntosh and R.B. Allison, contra. Mr. Allison cites: Temporary injunction may be granted without notice: 5 S.C. 159; 37 S.C. 223. And should be granted where the sole purpose is an injunction: 69 S.C. 159; 75 S.C. 220; 84 S.C. 51; 86 S.C. 160. Failure to require bond is not a jurisdictional defect: 5 S.C. 159.


July 7, 1911. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


It is error to grant an order staying execution without notice to the adverse party, or his attorney. Code Civ. Proced., 242a.

On issuing an injunction, the Court has no power to dispense with an undertaking, with or without sureties, as required by section 243 of the Code. Smith v. Smith, 51 S.C. 379, 29 S.E. 227; Water Co. v. Nunamaker, 73 S.C. 550, 53 S.E. 996.

No point is made and no opinion expressed as to whether this action will lie. But, see Croker v. Allen, 34 S.C. 452, 13 S.E. 650.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Insurance Co. v. Mobley

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 7, 1911
89 S.C. 189 (S.C. 1911)
Case details for

Insurance Co. v. Mobley

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. MOBLEY

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 7, 1911

Citations

89 S.C. 189 (S.C. 1911)
71 S.E. 817

Citing Cases

Lumber Company v. Hodges

Plaintiff appeals. Messrs. M.C. Woods and A.F. Woods, for appellant, cite: Use of logging road should not be…

Boozer v. Evans

New trial ordered. Messrs. Tompkins, Barnett McDonald, for appellant, cite: As to error in Judge's charge: 93…