From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Insky v. Machat

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 827 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

June, 1901.

M.M. Greenstein, for appellant.

E. Rosenthal, for respondent.


The infirmity in the trial, whereof this judgment is the result, is that there is no proof that defendant ever satisfied the debt, after having reached majority. The only evidence is that he made a promise to one Schwartz in the summer of 1900. The defendant was born June 5, 1879, so the promise may have been made prior to June 5, 1900.

Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide event.


Summaries of

Insky v. Machat

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 827 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Insky v. Machat

Case Details

Full title:SOLOMON INSKY, Respondent, v . BENJAMIN MACHAT, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1901

Citations

35 Misc. 827 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)