Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-0660 RMW
03-21-2013
INNOVUS PRIME LLC, Plaintiff, v. PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendants.
CHRISTOPHER J. COX (Bar No. 151650) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP DAVID L. YOHAI (Admitted pro hac vice) ADAM C. HEMLOCK (Admitted pro hac vice) WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Attorneys for Defendants, PANASONIC CORPORATION AND PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
CHRISTOPHER J. COX (Bar No. 151650)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
DAVID L. YOHAI (Admitted pro hac vice)
ADAM C. HEMLOCK (Admitted pro hac vice)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Attorneys for Defendants,
PANASONIC CORPORATION AND
PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[•] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5).
Private Process: [ ] Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: [×] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) [ ] other requested deadline ________________________
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
By: ________________________
Christopher J. Cox
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Attorneys for Defendant|
Panasonic Corporation and
Panasonic Corporation of North America
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER
LLC
________________________
John W. Carpenter
12 Metairie Court
Metairie, LA 70001-3032
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Innovus Prime LLC
[] ORDER
[×] The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
[ ] The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE