Innovus Prime LLC v. LG Elecs. Inc.

Full title: INNOVUS PRIME LLC, Plaintiff, v. LG ELECTRONICS INC., et al, Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNI SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

CASE NO. CV 11-4223 JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 11-4223 JW

10-20-2011

INNOVUS PRIME LLC, Plaintiff, v. LG ELECTRONICS INC., et al, Defendants.

JOSEPH E. THOMAS (State Bar No. 101443) WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF (State Bar No. 183861) THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP W. PAUL SCHUCK (State Bar No. 203717) THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.

James Ware

JOSEPH E. THOMAS (State Bar No. 101443)

WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF (State Bar No. 183861)

THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP

W. PAUL SCHUCK (State Bar No. 203717)

THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT VIZIO, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Date of filing: August 26, 2011

Judge: The Honorable James Ware

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC ("IP") and Defendant Vizio, Inc. ("Vizio") agree to extend Vizio's time to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement (Docket No. 1) filed in this Court on August 26, 2011, up to and including November 21, 2011.

This is the second stipulation between IP and Vizio. (See Docket No. 30.) This change in time will not alter the date of any event or any deadline currently fixed by Court order.

Pursuant to General Order 45 section X(B), counsel for Vizio efiling this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this stipulation has been obtained from the other signatory of this document.

THOMAS WHITELAW & TYLER LLP

JOSEPH E. THOMAS

WILLIAM J. KOLEGRAFF

W. PAUL SCHUCK

Attorneys for Defendant VIZIO, INC.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPEN

JOHN W. CARPENTER

Attorneys for Plaintiff INNOVUS PRIME LLC