From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Innovus Prime, LLC v. LG Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-04223-JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-04223-JW

10-07-2011

INNOVUS PRIME, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Marc N. Bernstein (CA SBN 145837) Will B. Fitton (CA SBN 181828) THE BERNSTEIN LAW GROUP, P.C. San Francisco, California 94111 MICHAEL V. SOLOMITA (pro hac vice pending) AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP New York, New York 10016 Attorneys for Defendants FUNAI CORPORATION, INC. and FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD


Marc N. Bernstein (CA SBN 145837)

Will B. Fitton (CA SBN 181828)

THE BERNSTEIN LAW GROUP, P.C.

San Francisco, California 94111

MICHAEL V. SOLOMITA (pro hac vice pending)

AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP

New York, New York 10016

Attorneys for Defendants

FUNAI CORPORATION, INC. and

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD

Judge James Ware

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FUNAI DEFENDANTS TO

RESPOND TO COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-1(a)


STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Innovus Prime, LLC and Defendants Funai Electric Co., Ltd., a Japanese company, ("Funai Japan") and Funai Corporation, Inc., its United States subsidiary, ("Funai U.S."), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Funai Japan will waive service of the summons and complaint and counsel for Funai Japan will accept service on its behalf, and that the time for both Funai Japan and Funai U.S. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended by sixty days, to and including December 12, 2011.

The sixtieth day technically falls upon Saturday, December 10, 2011. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, the deadline to file a response to the Complaint falls upon "the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday," which is Monday, December 12, 2011.

In accordance with N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, Section X, the filer of this document hereby attests that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory hereto.

Respectfully submitted,

Marc N. Bernstein

Will B. Fitton

THE BERNSTEIN LAW GROUP, P.C.

Michael V. Solomita

AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN, LLP

By: Will B. Fitton

Attorneys for Defendants

FUNAI CORPORATION, INC. and

FUNAI ELECTRIC COMPANY, LTD

John W. Carpenter

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER LLC

By: John W. Carpenter

Attorneys for Plaintiff

INNOVUS PRIME, LLC


Summaries of

Innovus Prime, LLC v. LG Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 7, 2011
Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-04223-JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Innovus Prime, LLC v. LG Elecs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:INNOVUS PRIME, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No.: 3:11-cv-04223-JW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)