Opinion
ADAM J. GUTRIDE, SETH A. SAFIER, TODD KENNEDY, MARIE A. McCRARY, GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC.
Adam R. Alper, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, San Francisco, California,
Timothy G. Majors, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Defendant Kno, Inc.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC ("Innovative Automation") and Defendant Kno, Inc. ("Kno") (collectively, the "Parties") file this Stipulation of Dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) because the Parties have resolved all claims and counterclaims between them in this litigation, and jointly stipulate to the dismissal of same, and that Innovative Automation's claims brought in this litigation against Kno are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
A proposed Order is attached.
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Innovative Automation LLC ("Innovative Automation") and Defendant Kno, Inc. ("Kno") (collectively, the "Parties") have announced to the Court that they have resolved all claims and counterclaims between them in this litigation, and jointly stipulate to the dismissal of same. Therefore, it is ORDERED that all of Innovative Automation's claims brought in this litigation against Kno are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.