Opinion
No. C11-03409
10-04-2011
NOT FOR CITATION
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
FILE ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
UNDER CIVIL L.R. 3-12(b)
Excluding Innovative Automation LLC v. Microtech Systems, 4:11-cv-01299, which, according to plaintiff's counsel, is settling, there are four other pending cases in this district which may be related to the present one. They are:
Innovative Automation LLC v. Mediatechnics Systems, Inc., 5:11-cv-03410 HRL
Innovative Automation LLC v. DisCopyLabs, 3:11-cv-03411 CRB
Innovative Automation LLC v. Acutrack Inc., 5:11-cv-3412 LHK
Rimage Corp. v. Innovative Automation LLC, 4:11-cv-04224 DMR
Accordingly, under the authority of Civil L.R. 3-12(c), the parties in the present case are ordered to file forthwith an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related (Civil. L.R. 3-12(b)).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
C11-3713 Notice will be electronically mailed to:
Adam Gutride adam@gutridesafier.com
Seth Adam Safier seth@gutridesafier.com
Todd Michael Kennedy todd@gutridesafier.com
Victoria L.H. Booke vbooke@gmail.com
Martin R. Glick mglick@howardrice.com
Edward Andrew Bayley ebayley@howardrice.com
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.