Opinion
2:22-cv-01362-CDS-VCF
11-01-2022
INNOVATIV MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Wyoming corporation, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BEYS; RICHARD DE SILVA; and FTE NETWORKS, INC., a Nevada corporation Defendants.
Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Chelsie Adams, Esq. (SBN 13058) FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff
Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Chelsie Adams, Esq. (SBN 13058) FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR INNOVATIV MEDIA GROUP, INC. TO FILE A SUR-REPLY TO DEFENDANTS MICHAEL BEYS AND RICHARD DE SILVA'S JOINDER TO DEFENDANT FTE NETWORKS INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF #38]
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(g), Plaintiff Innovativ Media Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”') and Michael Beys, Richard de Silva and FTE Networks, Inc., (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) stipulate through their undersigned counsel that Plaintiff may file the sur-reply attached as Exhibit 1, to Defendants Michael Beys and Richard De Silva's Joinder to Defendant FTE Networks, Inc.'s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss (ECF #38), because the joinder raised new arguments that were not raised in the original motion to dismiss (ECF # 29), or the joinder to the motion to dismiss (ECF # 31), and were not briefed by Plaintiff in its opposition to the motion to dismiss and joinder (ECF #36).
It is further agreed that nothing in this stipulation shall be deemed to waive or prejudice any claims or defenses of any party to this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing on the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 29) is set on November 9, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. in LV Courtroom 6B.