Opinion
2:22-cv-01184-JCM-EJY
08-31-2022
INNOVATIV MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Wyoming corporation; TTP8, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL BEYS; RICHARD DE SILVA; LATERAL U.S. OPPORTUNITIES FUND AI, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership; LATERAL U.S. CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES FUND QP, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership; LATERAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LATERAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LATERAL FTE FEEDER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; LATERAL JUSCOM FEEDER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; DOES IX; ROE Entities, I-X, Defendants. and FTE NETWORKS INC., nominal party.
Daniel S. Cereghino, Brandi M. Planet, Austin M. Maul, Attorneys for Lateral U.S. Credit Opportunities Fund QP, L.P., Lateral Credit Opportunities, LLC, Lateral Investment Management, LLC, Lateral Fte Feeder, LLC, and Lateral Juscom Feeder, LLC Therese M. Shanks, Wade Beavers, Andrew K. Stuztman, Adam Petitt, Pro Hac Vice Pending Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Daniel S. Cereghino, Brandi M. Planet, Austin M. Maul, Attorneys for Lateral U.S. Credit Opportunities Fund QP, L.P., Lateral Credit Opportunities, LLC, Lateral Investment Management, LLC, Lateral Fte Feeder, LLC, and Lateral Juscom Feeder, LLC
Therese M. Shanks, Wade Beavers, Andrew K. Stuztman, Adam Petitt, Pro Hac Vice Pending Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' VERIFIED COMPLAINT (Second Request)
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiffs Innovativ Media Group, INC. and TTP8, LLC and Defendants Lateral U.S. Credit Opportunities Fund QP, L.P., Lateral Credit Opportunities, LLC, Lateral Investment Management, LLC, Lateral Fte Feeder, LLC, and Lateral Juscom Feeder, LLC (collectively the “Lateral Companies”) stipulate through their undersigned counsel that the Lateral Companies' deadline to file a response to Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint be extended from August 31, 2022 to September 14, 2022. Plaintiffs consent to the extension. It is further agreed that nothing in this stipulation shall be deemed to waive or prejudice any claims or defenses of any party to this action.
The extension is requested because Plaintiff filed another Federal Action (see case No.: 2:22-cv-01362), which included an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order. To allow the Lateral Companies sufficient time to potentially resolve the issues in the new matter and to discuss other related issues, the Lateral Companies require an extension for its response to the complaint in this matter. No other defendants have appeared in the case and there will be no prejudice to other parties if this extension is granted.
DATED this 31st day of August, 2022.
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C.
LEX DOMUS LAW
IT IS SO ORDERED.