Opinion
2:22-cv-01362-CDS-VCF
04-24-2023
INNOVATIV MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Wyoming corporation, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL BEYS; RICHARD DE SILVA; and FTE NETWORKS, INC., a Nevada corporation. Defendants.
Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Kendall M. Lovell, Esq. (SBN 15590) MaryJo E. Smart, Esq. (SBN 16139) FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Kendall M. Lovell, Esq. (SBN 15590) MaryJo E. Smart, Esq. (SBN 16139) AND Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff Daniel S. Cereghino, Esq. (SBN 11534) Brandi M. Planet, Esq. (SBN 11710) Austin M. Maul, Esq. (SBN 15596) Attorneys for Defendants
Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Kendall M. Lovell, Esq. (SBN 15590) MaryJo E. Smart, Esq. (SBN 16139) FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff
Therese M. Shanks, Esq. (SBN 12890) Wade Beavers, Esq. (SBN 13451) Kendall M. Lovell, Esq. (SBN 15590) MaryJo E. Smart, Esq. (SBN 16139) AND Andrew K. Stutzman, Esq. (PA Bar No. 72922) Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiff
Daniel S. Cereghino, Esq. (SBN 11534) Brandi M. Planet, Esq. (SBN 11710) Austin M. Maul, Esq. (SBN 15596) Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF 62] AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND STAY OF DISCOVERY [ECF 63] (FIRST REQUEST
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff Innovativ Media Group, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Michael Beys, Richard de Silva and FTE Networks, Inc. (collectively the “Defendants”) stipulate through their undersigned counsel that Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment filed on March 28, 2023 (ECF No. 62) be extended to April 25, 2023, and Defendants' deadline to file a reply in support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment also be extended by two weeks to May 9, 2023. Plaintiff and Defendants further stipulate through their undersigned counsel: (1) to a stay of discovery until the date an order is issued on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss; and, (2) that Plaintiffs' deadline to file an opposition to Defendants' Renewed Motion to Stay Discovery filed on March 28, 2023 (ECF No. 63) is extended to a date two weeks from the date the order is issued on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss. Defendants consent to the extension of Plaintiffs' deadlines and the stay of discovery.
IT IS SO ORDERED.