From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Innes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 24, 1993
620 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 1993)

Opinion

No. 79902.

June 24, 1993.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 91-02666, Pinellas County.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Peggy A. Quince and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.


We have for review Innes v. State, 597 So.2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court asserted conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We addressed the issue in this case in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1993). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Sirmons.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.


I concur, but with the same reservations I expressed in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1993).


Summaries of

Innes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 24, 1993
620 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 1993)
Case details for

Innes v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH INNES, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 24, 1993

Citations

620 So. 2d 1233 (Fla. 1993)