From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Town of New Hartford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, Murphy, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Green, O'Donnell and Pine, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and determination and order of Town Board dated August 6, 1984 amended, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court erred in finding that the town followed all procedural requirements in ordering demolition of plaintiff's building. New Hartford Code § 52-4 provides that an owner shall have 30 days in which to repair or remove a building or structure determined by the town to be unsafe or dangerous, and the town ordered plaintiff to remove his building within 30 days, without providing him the opportunity for repair. From the minutes of the Town Board meeting of July 18th it is clear that petitioner expressed his intent to repair the building, and under section 52-4 he must be provided an opportunity to do so. The town order must be amended accordingly.


Summaries of

Inman v. Town of New Hartford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Inman v. Town of New Hartford

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD D. INMAN, Also Known as RICK D. INMAN, Appellant, v. TOWN OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Meints v. Vill. of Diller

However, in order for a city to properly exercise its police power in the destruction of a nuisance so as to…

Blanchard v. City of Ralston

Furthermore, due process in this situation requires notice, an opportunity to be heard, and an opportunity to…