From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Technicolor USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2012
2:11-CV-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-CV-00666-GLL 2:11-CV-00748-GLL

03-16-2012

RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et al., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, TERSHEL & ASSOCIATES Paul A. Tershel, Esq. Jarrod T. Takah, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN Edward A. Miller Attorney for Defendant Allied Electronics, Inc. THORP REED & ARMSTRONG LLP Randolph T. Struk Samuel Hornak Attorneys for Defendant Angela Instruments WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY Attorney for Defendants Antique Electronics and CE Distribution LLC also known as CE Manufacturing LLC PION JOHNSON J. Lawson Johnston Anthony Carrone Attorney for Defendant Brent Jessee DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C. Michael J. Sweeney Attorney for Defendants General Electric Company & CBS Corporation ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT Phillip J. Binotto, Jr. Marcia L. DePaula Attorneys for Defendants New Sensor Corporation, Doug's Tubes, and PM of America WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO Concetta A. Silvaggio Terrence Henne Attorneys for Defendants MCM Electronics ROBB LEONARD & MULVIHILL R. Sean O'Connell Attorney for Defendants Michael C. Marx, t/d/b/a SND Tube Sales ZIMMER KUNZ Joni M. Mangino Matthew C. Breneman Attorneys for Defendant Richardson Electronics, Ltd. ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT Robert J. Hafner Daniel J. Sinclair Attorney for Defendant Technicolor SA THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER Suzanne Merrick Attorney for Defendant R.L. Grinnell WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Walter Jenkins Salvatore A. Clemente Attorneys for Defendant The Tube Store


CONSOLIDATED AT:

2:11-cv-00666-GLL, effective: June 21,2011


STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT THE TUBE STORE

PURSUANT TO RULE 41

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41, it is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties who have appeared in this action, through their designated counsel, that the claims of Plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, and any cross-claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant, The Tube Store.

Respectfully submitted,

TERSHEL & ASSOCIATES

______________________

Paul A. Tershel, Esq.

Jarrod T. Takah, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER

COLEMAN & GOGGIN

______________________

Edward A. Miller

Attorney for Defendant Allied Electronics, Inc.

THORP REED & ARMSTRONG LLP

______________________

Randolph T. Struk

Samuel Hornak

Attorneys for Defendant Angela Instruments

WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON

STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY

______________________

Attorney for Defendants Antique Electronics

and CE Distribution LLC also known as

CE Manufacturing LLC

PION JOHNSON

______________________

J. Lawson Johnston

Anthony Carrone

Attorney for Defendant Brent Jessee

DICKIE, MCCAMEY & CHILCOTE, P.C.

______________________

Michael J. Sweeney

Attorney for Defendants General Electric

Company & CBS Corporation

ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN &

MELLOTT

______________________

Phillip J. Binotto, Jr.

Marcia L. DePaula

Attorneys for Defendants New Sensor

Corporation, Doug's Tubes, and PM of

America

WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO

______________________

Concetta A. Silvaggio

Terrence Henne

Attorneys for Defendants MCM Electronics

ROBB LEONARD & MULVIHILL

______________________

R. Sean O'Connell

Attorney for Defendants Michael C. Marx,

t/d/b/a SND Tube Sales

ZIMMER KUNZ

______________________

Joni M. Mangino

Matthew C. Breneman

Attorneys for Defendant Richardson

Electronics, Ltd.

ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN &

MELLOTT

______________________

Robert J. Hafner

Daniel J. Sinclair

Attorney for Defendant Technicolor SA

THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER

______________________

Suzanne Merrick

Attorney for Defendant R.L. Grinnell

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ

EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

______________________

Walter Jenkins

Salvatore A. Clemente

Attorneys for Defendant The Tube Store

BY THE COURT;

______________________ J.

CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER


Summaries of

Inman v. Technicolor USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 16, 2012
2:11-CV-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Inman v. Technicolor USA

Case Details

Full title:RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

2:11-CV-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 16, 2012)