Opinion
2:11-cv-00666-GLL 2:11-cv-00748-GLL
09-24-2012
RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.
Daniel J. Sinclair, Esq. Robert Hafner, Esq. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor USA, Inc. Paul A. Tershel, Esq. Jarrod T. Takah, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Sweeney, Esq. Lisa Barnett, Esq. DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE Counsel for Defendant-CBS and Defendant-GE Terrance Henne, Esq. Concetta Silvaggio, Esq. WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO Counsel for Defendant Joni Mangino, Esq. Matthew Breneman, Esq. ZIMMER KUNZ Counsel for Defendant-Richardson
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO RULE 41 AS TO DEFENDANT TECHNICOLOR USA, INC.
Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41, it is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their designated counsel, that the claims of Plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, and any cross-claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant, Technicolor USA, INC.
Respectfully submitted, ______________
Daniel J. Sinclair, Esq.
Robert Hafner, Esq.
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT
Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor USA, Inc.
______________
Paul A. Tershel, Esq.
Jarrod T. Takah, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
______________
Michael Sweeney, Esq.
Lisa Barnett, Esq.
DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE
Counsel for Defendant-CBS and
Defendant-GE
______________
Terrance Henne, Esq.
Concetta Silvaggio, Esq.
WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO
Counsel for Defendant-MCM
______________
Joni Mangino, Esq.
Matthew Breneman, Esq.
ZIMMER KUNZ
Counsel for Defendant-Richardson
AND NOW, this 24th, day of Sepepember, 2012, IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
__________, C.J.
CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER