Opinion
2:11-cv-00666-GIL 2:11-cv-00748-GLL
03-21-2012
RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.
Paul A. Tershel, Esq. Jarrod T. Takah, Esq. 55 South Main St. Washington, PA 15301 Attorneys for Plaintiff ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT Phillip Binotto Marcia DePaula Counsel for Defendants-New Sensor and PM of America WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO Concetta Silvaggio Terrance Henne Counsel for Defendant-MCM ZIMMER KUNZ Joni Mangino Matthew Breneman Counsel for Defendant-Richardson
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
CONSOLIDATED AT: 2:11-cv-00666-GIL, effective: June 21, 2011
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO RULE 41 AS TO DEFENDANT PM OF AMERICA. INC.
Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41, it is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties who have appeared in this action, through their designated counsel, that the claims of Plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, and any cross-claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant, PM of America, Inc.
Respectfully submitted,
________
Paul A. Tershel, Esq.
Jarrod T. Takah, Esq.
55 South Main St.
Washington, PA 15301
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT
_________
Phillip Binotto
Marcia DePaula
Counsel for Defendants-New Sensor and
PM of America
DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE
__________
Michael Sweeney
Lisa Barnett
Counsel for Defendant-CBS and
GE
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT
___________
Robert Hafner
Daniel J. Sinclair
Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor
WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO
___________
Concetta Silvaggio
Terrance Henne
Counsel for Defendant-MCM
ZIMMER KUNZ
Joni Mangino
Matthew Breneman
Counsel for Defendant-Richardson
AND NOW, this 21, day of March, 2012, IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY/THE COURT:
___________________
CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER