From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Technicolor USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 2, 2012
2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-00666-GLL 2:11-cv-00748-GLL

03-02-2012

RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, Paul A. Tershel, Esq. Jarrod T. Takah, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN Edward A. Miller Counsel for Defendant-Allied Electronics, Inc. THORP REED ARMSTRONG Randolph Struk Samuel Hornak Counsel for Defendant-Angela Instruments WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY David Rosenberg Counsel for Defendant-Antique Electronics and Defendant-CE Distribution PION JOHNSON J. Lawson Johnston Anthony Carrone Counsel for Defendant-Brent Jessee DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE Michael Sweeney Lisa Barnett Counsel for Defendant-CBS and Defendant-GE ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT Phillip Binotto Marcia DePaula Counsel for Defendants-New Sensor, Doug's Tubes and PM of America WILLMAN & S1LVAGGI0 Concetta Silvaggio Terrance Henne Counsel for Defendant-MCM ROBB LEONARD & MULV1HILL R. Sean O'Connell Counsel for Defendant-Marx/SND Z1MMER KUNZ Joni Mangino Matthew Breneman Counsel for Defendant-Richardson ECKERT SEAMANS CH1-RIN & MELLOTT Robert Hafner Daniel J. Sinclair Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER Suzanne Merrick Counsel for Defendant-R.L. Grinnell t/d/b/a Surplus Sales of Nebraska WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER Walter Jenkins Salvatore A. Clemente Counsel for Defendant-the Tube Store and Defendant- Tube Zone


ELECTRONICALLY FILED


CONSOLIDATED AT:

2:11-cv-00666-GLL, effective: June 21, 2011


STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO RULE 41 AS TO DEFENDANT R.L.GRINNELL t/d/b/a SURPLUS

SALES OF NEBRASKA

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41, it is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties who have appeared in this action, through their designated counsel, that the claims of Plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, and any cross-claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant, R.L. Grinnell t/d/b/a Surplus Sales of Nebraska.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

Paul A. Tershel, Esq.

Jarrod T. Takah, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER

COLEMAN & GOGGIN

______________________

Edward A. Miller

Counsel for Defendant-Allied Electronics, Inc.

THORP REED ARMSTRONG

______________________

Randolph Struk

Samuel Hornak

Counsel for Defendant-Angela Instruments

WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON

STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY

______________________

David Rosenberg

Counsel for Defendant-Antique Electronics

and Defendant-CE Distribution

PION JOHNSON

______________________

J. Lawson Johnston

Anthony Carrone

Counsel for Defendant-Brent Jessee

DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE

______________________

Michael Sweeney

Lisa Barnett

Counsel for Defendant-CBS and

Defendant-GE

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT

______________________

Phillip Binotto

Marcia DePaula

Counsel for Defendants-New Sensor, Doug's Tubes

and PM of America

WILLMAN & S1LVAGGI0

______________________

Concetta Silvaggio

Terrance Henne Counsel for Defendant-MCM

ROBB LEONARD & MULV1HILL

______________________

R. Sean O'Connell

Counsel for Defendant-Marx/SND

Z1MMER KUNZ

______________________

Joni Mangino

Matthew Breneman

Counsel for Defendant-Richardson

ECKERT SEAMANS CH1-RIN & MELLOTT

______________________

Robert Hafner

Daniel J. Sinclair

Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor

THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER

______________________

Suzanne Merrick

Counsel for Defendant-R.L. Grinnell t/d/b/a

Surplus Sales of Nebraska

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN &

DICKER

______________________

Walter Jenkins

Salvatore A. Clemente

Counsel for Defendant-the Tube Store and Defendant

Tube Zone

BY THE COURT:

______________________

CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER


Summaries of

Inman v. Technicolor USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 2, 2012
2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Inman v. Technicolor USA

Case Details

Full title:RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 2, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2012)