Opinion
2:11-cv-00666-GLL 2:11-cv-00748-GLL
03-22-2012
RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
CONSOLIDATED AT:
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO RULE 41 AS TO DEFENDANT NEW SENSOR CORPORATION
Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41, it is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties who have appeared in this action, through their designated counsel, that the claims of Plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, and any cross-claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant, New Sensor Corporation.
Respectfully submitted,
___________
Paul A. Tershel, Esq.
Jarrod T. Takah, Esq.
55 South Main St.
Washington, PA 15301
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT
___________
Phillip Binotto
Marcia DePaula
Counsel for Defendants-New Sensor and
PM of America
(s) Jarrod T. Takah (W0028470.1)
DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE
___________
Michael Sweeney
Lisa Barnett
Counsel for Defendant-CBS and
GE
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN& MELLOTT
___________
Robert Hafner
Daniel J. Sinclair
Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor
WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO
___________
Concetta Silvaggio
Terrance Henne
Counsel for Defendant-MCM
ZIMMER KUNZ
___________
Joni Mangino
Matthew Breneman
Counsel for Defendant-Richardson
BY THE COURT:
___________
CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER