From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Technicolor USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 1, 2012
2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-00666-GLL 2:11-cv-00748-GLL

03-01-2012

RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.

Paul A. Tershel, Esq. Jarrod T. Takah, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN THORP REED ARMSTRONG Edward A. Miller Counsel for Defendant-Allied Electronics, Inc. Randolph Struk Samuel Hornak Counsel for Defendant-Angela Instruments WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY David Rosenberg Counsel for Defendant-Antique Electronics and Defendant-CE Distribution PION JOHNSON J. Lawson Johnston Anthony Carrone Counsel for Defendant-Brent Jessee DICKIE McCAMEY & CH1LC0TE Michael Sweeney Lisa Barnett Counsel for Defendant-CBS and Defendant-GE WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO Concetta Silvaggio Terrance Henne Counsel for Defendant-MCM ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT Phillip Binotto Marcia DePaula Counsel for Defendants-Nev Sensor, Doug's Tubes and PM of America ROBB LEONARD & MUL VIHILL R. Sean O'Connell Counsel for Defendant-Marx/SND ZIMMER KUNZ Joni Mangino Matthew Breneman Counsel for Defendant-Richardson ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT Robert Hafner Daniel J. Sinclair Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER Suzanne Merrick Counsel for Defendant-R.L. Grinnell WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER Walter Jenkins Salvatore A. Clemente Counsel for Defendant-the Tube Store and Defendant- Tube Zone


ELECTRONICALLY FILED


CONSOLIDATED AT:


STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO RULE 41 AS TO DEFENDANT DOUG'S TUBES

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41, it is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties who have appeared in this action, through their designated counsel, that the claims of Plaintiff, Ryan C. Inman, and any cross-claims are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendant, Doug's Tubes.

Respectfully submitted,

______________

Paul A. Tershel, Esq.

Jarrod T. Takah, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER

COLEMAN & GOGGIN

THORP REED ARMSTRONG

______________

Edward A. Miller

Counsel for Defendant-Allied Electronics, Inc.

______________

Randolph Struk

Samuel Hornak

Counsel for Defendant-Angela Instruments

WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON

STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY

______________

David Rosenberg

Counsel for Defendant-Antique Electronics

and Defendant-CE Distribution

PION JOHNSON

______________

J. Lawson Johnston

Anthony Carrone

Counsel for Defendant-Brent Jessee

DICKIE McCAMEY & CH1LC0TE

______________

Michael Sweeney

Lisa Barnett

Counsel for Defendant-CBS and

Defendant-GE

WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO

______________

Concetta Silvaggio

Terrance Henne

Counsel for Defendant-MCM

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT

______________

Phillip Binotto

Marcia DePaula

Counsel for Defendants-Nev Sensor, Doug's Tubes

and PM of America

ROBB LEONARD & MUL VIHILL

______________

R. Sean O'Connell

Counsel for Defendant-Marx/SND

ZIMMER KUNZ

______________

Joni Mangino

Matthew Breneman

Counsel for Defendant-Richardson

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT

______________

Robert Hafner

Daniel J. Sinclair

Counsel for Defendant-Technicolor

THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER

______________

Suzanne Merrick

Counsel for Defendant-R.L. Grinnell

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN &

DICKER

______________

Walter Jenkins

Salvatore A. Clemente

Counsel for Defendant-the Tube Store and Defendant

Tube Zone

BY THE COURT:

______________

CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER


Summaries of

Inman v. Technicolor USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 1, 2012
2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Inman v. Technicolor USA

Case Details

Full title:RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR USA, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 1, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2012)