From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Technicolor SA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 9, 2012
2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-00666-GLL 2:11-cv-00748-GLL

03-09-2012

RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR SA, et. al., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, Paul A. Tershel, Jarrod T. Takah, TERSHEL & ASSOCIATES Counsel for Plaintiff Ryan C. Inman Randolph Struk Samuel Hornack THORP REED & ARMSTRONG, LLP One Oxford Centre Counsel for Defendant Angela Instruments Edward A. Miller MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 Counsel for Defendant Allied Electronics, Inc. David Rosenberg Christopher P. Deegan WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON STAPLETON FIRES & NEWBY , LLP Counsel for Defendant Antique Electronics and CD Distribution Phillip Binotto Marcia DePaula ECK.ERT SEAMANS CHER1N & MELLOTT Summit Corporate Center Counsel for Defendants New Sensor, Doug's Tubes and PM of America J, Lawson Johnston Anthony Carrone PION JOHNSON NERONE GIRMAN CLEMENTS & SMITH P.C. Counsel for Defendant Brent Jessee Recording and Supply Michael J. Sweeney Lisa Barnett DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE Counsel for Defendants CBS and GE R. Sean O'Connell James Godwin ROBB LEONARD & MULVIHILL Counsel for Defendant Marx/SND Concetta Silvaggio Terrance Henne WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO Counsel for Defendant MCM Robert Hafner Daniel J. Sinclair ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT Counsel for Defendant Technicolor Joni Mangino Matthew G. Breneman ZIMMER KUNZ Counsel for Defendant Richardson Walter Jenkins Salvatore A. Clemente WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER Counsel for Defendant The Tube Store Suzanne Merrick THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER Counsel for Defendant R.L. Grinnell


ELECTRONICALLY FILED


CONSOLIDATED AT:

2:11-cv-00666-GLL, effective: June 21, 2011


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ANGELA INSTRUMENTS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Ryan C. Inman and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby file this Stipulation of Dismissal of Angela Instruments Without Prejudice. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, each of these parties hereby stipulates and agrees to the dismissal without prejudice of all claims stated against Angela Instruments in this matter, including those set forth in the Complaint filed in the above-captioned action, as well as in any cross-claim asserted in response thereto.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

Paul A. Tershel,

Jarrod T. Takah,

TERSHEL & ASSOCIATES

Counsel for Plaintiff Ryan C. Inman

______________________

Randolph Struk

Samuel Hornack

THORP REED & ARMSTRONG, LLP

One Oxford Centre

Counsel for Defendant Angela Instruments

______________________

Edward A. Miller

MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER

COLEMAN & GOGGIN

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

Counsel for Defendant Allied Electronics, Inc.

______________________

David Rosenberg

Christopher P. Deegan

WEBER GALLAGHER SIMPSON STAPLETON

FIRES & NEWBY , LLP

Counsel for Defendant Antique Electronics and

CD Distribution

______________________

Phillip Binotto

Marcia DePaula

ECK.ERT SEAMANS CHER1N & MELLOTT

Summit Corporate Center

Counsel for Defendants New Sensor, Doug's

Tubes and PM of America

______________________

J, Lawson Johnston

Anthony Carrone

PION JOHNSON NERONE GIRMAN CLEMENTS &

SMITH P.C.

Counsel for Defendant Brent Jessee Recording and

Supply

______________________

Michael J. Sweeney

Lisa Barnett

DICKIE McCAMEY & CHILCOTE

Counsel for Defendants CBS and GE

______________________

R. Sean O'Connell

James Godwin

ROBB LEONARD & MULVIHILL

Counsel for Defendant Marx/SND

______________________

Concetta Silvaggio

Terrance Henne

WILLMAN & SILVAGGIO

Counsel for Defendant MCM

______________________

Robert Hafner

Daniel J. Sinclair

ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT

Counsel for Defendant Technicolor

______________________

Joni Mangino

Matthew G. Breneman

ZIMMER KUNZ

Counsel for Defendant Richardson

______________________

Walter Jenkins

Salvatore A. Clemente

WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN &

DICKER

Counsel for Defendant The Tube Store

______________________

Suzanne Merrick

THOMAS THOMAS & HAFER

Counsel for Defendant R.L. Grinnell

BY THE COURT:

______________________

CHIEF JUDGE GARY L. LANCASTER


Summaries of

Inman v. Technicolor SA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 9, 2012
2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Inman v. Technicolor SA

Case Details

Full title:RYAN C. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. TECHNICOLOR SA, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-00666-GLL (W.D. Pa. Mar. 9, 2012)