Inman v. Jungle Quest Franchising, LLC

Full title: Ian Inman, an individual; Richard Inman, an individual; Diane Inman, an…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 30, 2010

CASE NO. C 09-05584 CW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 09-05584 CW.

April 30, 2010

SEAN D. BAKER CO BAR # 25949, ANDREW M. UNTHANK, CO BAR #36832, WHEELER TRIGG O'DONNELL LLP, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Defendants Jungle Quest Franchising, LLC; William E. Gabbard; Kevin P. Hein; James S. Molloy; and Douglas W. Root, Admitted Pro Hac Vice.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge

Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice, and good cause appearing therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice between Defendants JUNGLE QUEST FRANCHING LLC, WILLIAM E. GABBARD, KEVIN P. HEIN, JAMES S. MOLLOY, and DOUGLAS W. ROOT (collectively "JUNGLE QUEST"), on the one hand, and Plaintiffs IAN INMAN, RICHARD INMAN, DIANE INMAN, and JUNGLE PULSE, INC. (collectively "PLAINTIFFS"), on the other hand, is GRANTED, and PLAINTIFFS' claims against JUNGLE QUEST are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. This Order of Dismissal With Prejudice does not dismiss PLAINTIFFS' claims against Prety Flatherty Believeau Pachios Halley, LLP.