From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 18, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2217-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2217-CMK-P.

August 18, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner seeks the appointment of counsel (Doc. 39). There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel. Further requests for the appointment of counsel will not be considered.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 39) is denied.


Summaries of

Inman v. Clark

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 18, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2217-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Inman v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:RONALD JERRELL INMAN, Petitioner, v. KENNETH CLARK, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 18, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2217-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2009)