From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 1, 2016
2:15-cv-00267-JAW (D. Me. Aug. 1, 2016)

Opinion

2:15-cv-00267-JAW

08-01-2016

FRANK INMAN, Plaintiff, v. LARRY AUSTIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed June 30, 2016 (ECF No. 53), the Recommended Decision is accepted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50) be and hereby is GRANTED on Plaintiff's remaining federal claims and judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's federal claims. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's state claims be and hereby are DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ John A. Woodcock, Jr.

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 1st day of August, 2016


Summaries of

Inman v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Aug 1, 2016
2:15-cv-00267-JAW (D. Me. Aug. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Inman v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:FRANK INMAN, Plaintiff, v. LARRY AUSTIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Aug 1, 2016

Citations

2:15-cv-00267-JAW (D. Me. Aug. 1, 2016)