From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Aug 9, 2011
No.: 3:10-CV-305 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

No.: 3:10-CV-305

08-09-2011

CHASITY M. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


(VARLAN/SHIRLEY)


ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 15] entered by Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE; plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 11] is DENIED; Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13] is GRANTED; and the decision of the defendant Commissioner in this case denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED. This case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Thomas A. Varlan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ENTERED AS A JUDGMENT

Patricia L. McNutt

CLERK OF COURT


Summaries of

Inman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Aug 9, 2011
No.: 3:10-CV-305 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Inman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHASITY M. INMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

No.: 3:10-CV-305 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 9, 2011)