From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 28, 2008
271 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-1208.

Submitted: March 19, 2008.

Decided: March 28, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Dennis L. Howell, Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00021).

V. Lamar Gudger, III, Gudger Gudger, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretehen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Chief Regional Counsel, Jason W. Valencia, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Denise M. Inman appeals the magistrate judge's order denying Inman's motion for summary judgment, granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment, and affirming the Commissioner's decision denying Inman disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Inman v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-00021 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to have the case decided by a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Inman v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 28, 2008
271 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Inman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Denise M. INMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 28, 2008

Citations

271 F. App'x 360 (4th Cir. 2008)