From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 580 (1964)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.

No. 849.

Decided June 22, 1964.

Together with No. 850, Hebb Narodick Construction Co., Inc., et al. v. Washington et al., and No. 851, Murray et al. v. Washington et al., both also on appeal from the same court.

Appeals dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 62 Wn.2d 619, 384 P.2d 337.

Seth W. Morrison for appellants in No. 849.

T. M. Royce for appellants in No. 850.

Edward G. Dobrin for appellants in No. 851.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, John W. Riley and Timothy R. Malone, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and James A. Furber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and I. Henry Kutz filed a memorandum for the United States.



The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Summaries of

Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington

U.S.
Jun 22, 1964
378 U.S. 580 (1964)
Case details for

Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:INLAND EMPIRE BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. v . WASHINGTON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 22, 1964

Citations

378 U.S. 580 (1964)

Citing Cases

Lutz v. C.I.R

The tax was upheld by the trial court, and the Washington Supreme Court affirmed in August of 1963. Murray v.…

Lutz v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

This letter will confirm our understanding and agreement that neither interest nor penalty will be charged on…