From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inks v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 12, 1959
162 N.E.2d 520 (Ohio 1959)

Opinion

No. 36158

Decided November 12, 1959.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Negligence — Railway crossing accident — Private crossing on private property — Motor vehicle operator approaching crossing — Poor visibility — Standard of care required — Contributory negligence — Due process — Equal protection of the law.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Messrs. Endress Endress, for appellant.

Messrs. Bulkley, Butler, Rini Schweid, Messrs. Squire, Sanders Dempsey and Mr. Charles F. Clarke, Jr., for appellees.


The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Inks v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 12, 1959
162 N.E.2d 520 (Ohio 1959)
Case details for

Inks v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:INKS, APPELLANT v. THE JONES LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP. ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 12, 1959

Citations

162 N.E.2d 520 (Ohio 1959)
162 N.E.2d 520
162 N.E.2d 464
170 Ohio St. 98

Citing Cases

New York Central Railroad Company v. Chernew

In Boles the court referred to the quoted testimony as being comparable to that in Rohr, supra. The evidence…