From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingrassia v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 6, 2008
252 S.W.3d 225 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 89963.

May 6, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Case No. 06SF-CC00877, Kenneth W. Pratte, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jamie Pamela Rasmussen, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

Prior report: 187 S.W.3d 918.



ORDER


Thomas J. Ingrassia (Movant) appeals the motion court's denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ingrassia v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 6, 2008
252 S.W.3d 225 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Ingrassia v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas J. INGRASSIA, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

252 S.W.3d 225 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Ingrassia v. Schafer

Id. Petitioner escaped by cutting through his window, climbing two stories down to the ground on…

Ingrassia v. Schafer

Plaintiff subsequently escaped from the facility now known as SORTS.Id. Plaintiff escaped by cutting through…