holding a three-year contractual limitation period was a reasonably sufficient time within which a plaintiff could have contested the denial of his claim for benefits
Summary of this case from Hembree v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co.No. 95-2185.
January 19, 1996.
N.D.Ind., 897 F.Supp. 632.
AFFIRMED.
holding a three-year contractual limitation period was a reasonably sufficient time within which a plaintiff could have contested the denial of his claim for benefits
Summary of this case from Hembree v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co.noting that the parties contested the district court's application of a five-year statute of limitations on the Title VI claim but stating "we need not decide this issue, since we hold on the merits that summary judgment for defendants was proper"
Summary of this case from Davis v. City of SpringfieldFull title:Ingram v. Travelers Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Date published: Jan 19, 1996
In this opinion, we address a question of first impression in this circuit as to which state statute of…
Cobb v. Lilly Ret. PlanBecause ERISA does not impose a statute of limitations under its civil enforcement provision, "the district…