From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 9, 2008
990 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 5D08-222.

August 8, 2008. Rehearing Denied September 9, 2008.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, James R. Clayton, Judge.

Kevin L. Ingram, Wewahitchka, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Ingram appeals from the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm, without discussion, the summary denial of claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11. We reverse as to claims 2 and 5 because the transcript excerpts cited by the trial judge were not attached to the order. Lane v. State, 868 So.2d 684 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). On remand, the trial court shall either attach the pertinent portions of the record relating to these claims or conduct an evidentiary hearing. We also reverse as to claims 3 and 7 because Ingram was entitled to have the opportunity to correct his pleading deficiencies. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2007).

As to claim 7, the trial court also failed to attach the cited transcript excerpts.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 9, 2008
990 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin INGRAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 9, 2008

Citations

990 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

LeBlanc v. State

Accordingly, because the record before us fails to make a showing that the appellant is conclusively entitled…