From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 21, 2011
60 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. 1D11-0554.

April 21, 2011.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus — Original Jurisdiction.

James Ingram, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for leave to supplement. Petitioner alleges that he filed the motion in the circuit court in 2003; however, the circuit court has no record of ever receiving the motion. Accordingly, because there is no pleading pending below, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Casen v. McDonough, 962 So.2d 977 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Petitioner alleges that he did timely place his pleading into the hands of prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, within 30 days of issuance of mandate in this cause, petitioner shall file with the clerk of the circuit court a copy of the pleading. See Rife v. State, 958 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Hartley v. Fla. Dep't of Corrections, 954 So.2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

PETITION DENIED.

WEBSTER, ROBERTS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 21, 2011
60 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:James INGRAM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

Citations

60 So. 3d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)