From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 24, 1992
599 So. 2d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-0948.

June 24, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Charles E. Smith, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Mallorye Cunningham, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We find no error as to appellant's point I and we affirm appellant's sentence. As to appellant's point II, we do not consider his constitutional attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because appellant would have been found to be an habitual felony offender under the pre-amended statute as well. Wright v. State, 579 So.2d 418 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 24, 1992
599 So. 2d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN INGRAM, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 24, 1992

Citations

599 So. 2d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Luchak v. State

However, we do not consider his attack on Chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, because Luchak would have been…

Harris v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Beaubrum v. State, 595 So.2d 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Ingram v. State, 599 So.2d 785…