From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 29, 1986
481 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-372.

January 29, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Broward County; Thomas M. Coker, Jr., Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Defendant's conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is vacated because of the trial court's failure to provide written justification for its departure from the presumptive sentence. See Rule 3.701(b)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.; State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985); Boynton v. State, 473 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA), aff'd, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla. 1985). On remand, we respectfully direct the trial court's attention to Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1985) (inappropriate considerations for departure); and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984) (notice required prior to imposition of costs).

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 29, 1986
481 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK INGRAM, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 29, 1986

Citations

481 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)