From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 28, 1981
285 S.E.2d 76 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

62115.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1981.

Drug violation. Hall Superior Court. Before Judge Palmour.

William I. Sykes, Jr., for appellant.

Jeff C. Wayne, District Attorney, Bruce L. Udolf, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Patricia Ingram was convicted of wrongful possession of controlled substances. She contends the trial court erred by denying her motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the state's evidence, and by denying her motion for a new trial. Both motions were based on a lack of proof by the state. We have examined the entire transcript and find the evidence established conclusively appellant's guilt of the offenses charged. Further, we find that a rational trier of fact could find from the evidence adduced at trial proof of appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 ( 264 S.E.2d 528) (1980). Accordingly, the enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgment affirmed. Shulman, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1981.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 28, 1981
285 S.E.2d 76 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:INGRAM v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 28, 1981

Citations

285 S.E.2d 76 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
159 Ga. App. 726

Citing Cases

Sanders v. Brown

The Browns were, after the foreclosure, tenants at sufferance and subject to summary dispossession. See…

Roberts v. Collins

(Cit.)' McKinney v. South Boston Savings Bank, 156 Ga. App. 114, 115 (2) ( 274 S.E.2d 34) (1980). See also…