From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 22, 1992
591 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3029.

January 22, 1992.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Thomas M. Coker, Jr., Judge.

Frederick Ingram, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 9.315, we affirm. See Bateman v. State, 566 So.2d 358 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 22, 1992
591 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Ingram v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK INGRAM, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 22, 1992

Citations

591 So. 2d 683 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)