From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Smith

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Mar 25, 2010
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-02 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-02 (HL).

March 25, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the Recommendation (Doc. 15) entered on February 2, 2010, of United States Magistrate Judge G. Mallon Faircloth, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Application for Federal Write of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner be denied. Petitioner has filed an objection to the Recommendation, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered Petitioner's objection and has made a de novo determination of the portion of the recommendation to which he objects. The Court finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's decision. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Recommendation. Petitioner's Application for Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 2) is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Smith

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Mar 25, 2010
Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-02 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Ingram v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS ANTHONY INGRAM, Petitioner, v. HUGH SMITH, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Mar 25, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:07-CV-02 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 25, 2010)