Opinion
Case No. SC03-762.
February 9, 2005.
Lower Tribunal No. 3D03-623.
The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied on the merits. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (holding that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must show that he has a clear legal right to performance of the requested act, that the respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
WELLS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.
ANSTEAD, J., would dismiss.