From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Ingram

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 17, 2013
110 So. 3d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 4D12–1940.

2013-04-17

Alton INGRAM, Appellant, v. Lisa INGRAM, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ronald J. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08–8467 42. Alton Ingram, Berkeley, CA, pro se. No brief filed on behalf of appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ronald J. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08–8467 42.
Alton Ingram, Berkeley, CA, pro se. No brief filed on behalf of appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order establishing summer visitation, as none of the arguments made by the appellant on appeal were preserved by proper objection in the trial court. In addition, the issues are moot for the previous summer's visitation. Nevertheless, we take this opportunity to observe that the restrictions regarding the possession of guns by the child or by the father in the presence of the child are overly broad. Even though the guardian ad litem and mother sought a prohibition against the child handling a real gun, BB gun, or paintball gun because of the child's tender years and his unfortunate experience with a BB gun on a visit with the father, the trial court additionally included in the prohibition toy guns. No evidence showed that the child should be disallowed to possess or play with a pop gun, water pistol or some similar childhood toy.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Ingram

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 17, 2013
110 So. 3d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Ingram v. Ingram

Case Details

Full title:Alton INGRAM, Appellant, v. Lisa INGRAM, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

110 So. 3d 987 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)