From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 31, 2024
No. 18854-23 (U.S.T.C. May. 31, 2024)

Opinion

18854-23

05-31-2024

RONALD L. INGRAM, JR. & UGENEAKA T. INGRAM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

Because the parties' Settlement Stipulation filed on May 31, 2024, fails to comply with Rule 23(a)(3) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, it is

ORDERED that the above-referenced Settlement Stipulation is deemed stricken from the Court's record in this case. It is further

ORDERED that, on or before July 1, 2024, the parties shall file a revised settlement stipulation. It is further

ORDERED that action on the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision filed on May 31, 2024, shall be held in abeyance pending further direction by the Court.

The parties are reminded that settlement stipulations are not considered decision documents for purposes of Rule 23(a)(4) of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure and accordingly must include the parties' contact information.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 31, 2024
No. 18854-23 (U.S.T.C. May. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Ingram v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:RONALD L. INGRAM, JR. & UGENEAKA T. INGRAM, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 31, 2024

Citations

No. 18854-23 (U.S.T.C. May. 31, 2024)