From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 27, 1928
225 Ky. 314 (Ky. Ct. App. 1928)

Opinion

Decided June 27, 1928.

Appeal from Letcher Circuit Court.

R. MONROE FIELDS for appellant.

J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, and S.H. BROWN, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Reversing.

Kirby Ingram was given two years in the penitentiary for detaining a female. The mother of the prosecuting witness was, over the objection of the defendant, allowed to state her daughter made complaint immediately upon the mother's return. That was error. See Kirby v. Com., 210 Ky. 353, 275 S.W. 866, and cases cited there. There was evidence that this prosecution was a frame-up, to punish the defendant for having driven the mother of the prosecuting witness out of his berry patch, and defendant urges he was entitled to a peremptory instruction, but we regard the evidence as sufficient to take the case to the jury.

The judgment is reversed.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Jun 27, 1928
225 Ky. 314 (Ky. Ct. App. 1928)
Case details for

Ingram v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:Ingram v. Commonwealth

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Jun 27, 1928

Citations

225 Ky. 314 (Ky. Ct. App. 1928)
8 S.W.2d 389

Citing Cases

Young v. Commonwealth

"It is equally settled that, in cases of detaining a woman against her will, it is not open to the…

McIntosh v. Commonwealth

It is equally settled that, in cases of detaining a woman against her will, it is not open to the…