From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2014
Case No. CV 12-7881-DOC (OP) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-7881-DOC (OP)

07-19-2014

CURTIS CLIFFORD INGRAM, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; and (2) directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

__________

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER

United States District Judge
Prepared by: __________
HONORABLE OSWALD PARADA
United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Ingram v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2014
Case No. CV 12-7881-DOC (OP) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Ingram v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS CLIFFORD INGRAM, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2014

Citations

Case No. CV 12-7881-DOC (OP) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2014)

Citing Cases

Ingram v. Quintana

However, it is unclear whether "§ 288" referred to a conviction for committing a lewd and lascivious act on a…

Flowers v. Foulk

California's bar against successive petitions is also adequate and independent. See, e.g., Rutledge v.…