From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Feb 1, 2019
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-2163 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 1, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-2163

02-01-2019

TIMOTHY WAYNE INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 1] :

Plaintiff Timothy Ingram seeks judicial review of Defendant Acting Social Security Commissioner's decision denying his applications for Period of Disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income. Magistrate Judge Jonathan Greenberg recommends that the Court affirm the Commissioner's final decision.

Doc. 1. The parties file merits briefs. Docs. 13, 14.

Doc. 15.

Objections to Judge Greenberg's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") were due within fourteen days. Judge Greenberg issued the R&R on August 17, 2018, and the Court has received no objections.

The Federal Magistrates Act requires the Court to review de novo only those portions of the R&R to which the parties have objected. Without objection, the Court may adopt the R&R without further review. Further, having reviewed the record, the Court agrees with the conclusions in the R&R.

Id.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). --------

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Greenberg's R&R, incorporating it fully herein by reference, and AFFIRMS the Commissioner's final decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2019

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ingram v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Feb 1, 2019
CASE NO. 1:17-CV-2163 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Ingram v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WAYNE INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Feb 1, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 1:17-CV-2163 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 1, 2019)

Citing Cases

Snead v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

The Sixth Circuit and several of its constituent District Courts, including this Court, have held that a…

Baker v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

See Dooley, 656 F. App'x at 122 (finding that ALJ was not required to contact consultative examiner whose…