From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Abington Sch. Dist. Auth.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 20, 2024
Civil Action 24-00174 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 20, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-00174

06-20-2024

JOHN INGRAM, III, Plaintiff, v. ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT AUTHORITY, Defendant.


ORDER

John Milton Younge Judge

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Abington School District Authority's (partial) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to Sate a Claim (ECF No. 10), and all papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. Plaintiff's claims for race or color retaliation under Counts One and Four of the Amended Complaint are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice based on the agreement reached between the Parties.
2. The term “race/color” in Paragraph 53(f) of the Amended Complaint is hereby STRICKEN and REPLACED with the term “protected activity.”
3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:


Summaries of

Ingram v. Abington Sch. Dist. Auth.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 20, 2024
Civil Action 24-00174 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Ingram v. Abington Sch. Dist. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN INGRAM, III, Plaintiff, v. ABINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT AUTHORITY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 20, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-00174 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 20, 2024)