From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingraham v. Travelers Companies

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 21, 1988
539 A.2d 733 (N.J. 1988)

Opinion

Argued March 14, 1988 —

Decided April 21, 1988.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Darrell Fineman argued the cause for appellant ( Capizola, Fineman Kutner, attorneys; Darrell Fineman and Barbara R. Lapham, on the briefs).

Edward H. Keiper argued the cause for respondent ( Richard A. De Michele, attorney; Edward H. Keiper, Arthur E. Donnelly, and Katharine Traeger, on the briefs).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 217 N.J. Super. 126 (1987).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Ingraham v. Travelers Companies

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 21, 1988
539 A.2d 733 (N.J. 1988)
Case details for

Ingraham v. Travelers Companies

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE INGRAHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 21, 1988

Citations

539 A.2d 733 (N.J. 1988)
539 A.2d 733

Citing Cases

Schulman v. O'Reilly-Lando

"If the statute is clear and unambiguous on its face and admits of only one interpretation, we need delve no…

Marie v. Motor Club of America Cos.

We conclude that "the language [of N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.1e] is clear and must be applied as written." See…