From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingraham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 25, 2013
116 So. 3d 382 (Fla. 2013)

Opinion

No. SC12–784.

2013-04-25

Kenneth INGRAHAM, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


The petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied for failure to establish that the petitioner has a clear legal right to the sought relief. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000). (“In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, a petitioner must demonstrate a clear legal right to the performance of the act requested, an indisputable legal duty on the part of the respondent, and that no other adequate remedy exists.”).

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingraham v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 25, 2013
116 So. 3d 382 (Fla. 2013)
Case details for

Ingraham v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth INGRAHAM, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 25, 2013

Citations

116 So. 3d 382 (Fla. 2013)