Opinion
1:20-CV-1188
06-02-2021
BRUCE INGRAHAM and HOLLY INGRAHAM, Plaintiffs, v. SUSAN CASEY and JOHN CASEY, Defendants.
BRUCE & HOLLY INGRAHAM Plaintiffs, Pro Se
BRUCE & HOLLY INGRAHAM
Plaintiffs, Pro Se
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
DAVID N. HURD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On September 28, 2020, pro se plaintiffs Bruce Ingraham and Holly Ingraham (“plaintiffs”) filed this action against defendants Susan Casey and John Casey (“defendants”). Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiffs also sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. Nos. 7, 9.
On May 12, 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel granted plaintiffs' motions to proceed IFP and advised by Report & Recommendation that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. Dkt. No. 10. As Judge Hummel explained, plaintiffs' complaint-which set forth only state law claims against non-diverse parties-failed to comply with federal pleading standards. Id. Plaintiffs have not filed objections, and the time period in which to do so has expired. See id.
Upon review for clear error, the Report & Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).
Therefore, it is ORDERED that
1. The Report & Recommendation (Dkt. No. 10) is accepted and adopted; and
2. Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter a judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.